Handling Replacement of Water Utility Infrastructure – Without Surprise Fee Increases!

March 11th, 2010

Replacement of aging water utility infrastructure has emerged as a growing concern for water service providers nationwide. When utilities delay and can no longer avoid replacing older facilities, the cost of rebuilding or replacing them frequently shocks unsuspecting rate payers. The ensuing conflict between rate payers and water providers is very painful to many communities – even those with larger systems. However, infrastructure replacement problems can appear insurmountable for smaller water providers.

The EPA reports that water utilities serving fewer than 3,300 customers – make up nearly 85% of all water systems in the United States. For these systems, the cost of infrastructure replacements is more than large, it’s unbelievable. The small town of Lebannon, OR provides a good example. The cost of replacing Lebannon’s incredibly old water treatment plant is going to cause water rates to increase by 60% is only one example among many of how major capital replacement costs in one small town can lead to a significant increase in customer water rates.

When presented with such high cost for replacing important equipment and infrastructure, what should a small utility do? There are no simple answers. The seemingly endless supply of grant dollars for these systems has all but disappeared, meaning that in order to avoid a 60% rate hike, even small utilities have to plan ahead for their replacement needs. Back in Lebannon, OR, the old water treatment plant had been in service since 1946! Running at capacity, the plant was only able to stay one day ahead of demand. It is not surprising that the facility would need to be substantially upgraded or replaced at some point – at least some time around the 64th year of service.

The costs for these replacements and upgrades can be reasonably estimated by professional engineers. With some foresight, small communities can begin implementation of smaller rate increases to establish a cash fund as well as build debt capacity for financing the replacement costs. Smaller utilities and communities that lack ready access to credit markets and don’t possess much reserve cash, the need for advance planning like this is even more critical.

Financial planning is essential to avoiding the surprises that accompany massive service rate increases. Water utility consultants provide these services, however most utility managers can begin without consulting help. Recognizing the need is step one. Understanding what the fixed assets situation is, where each facility is in its service life, and when each was put into service is important. Then, reasonable estimates can be made regarding expected timing of facility replacements and the associated costs for each replacement project.

Only at the point when facility life-span is understood along with replacement costs, can reasonable and informed decisions be made. The utility can then research the need for an increase to fees and rates and set expectations for the user community. Will most utility providers have to increase future fees? Many will. But by preparing to replace older facilities now and having a financial plan in place to handle the situation, smaller water providers can avoid the unpleasant surprises that accompany massive fee increases. Waiting until facilities become obsolete only invites difficulty and limits available options.

StepWise Water Utility Consultants assist water service providers nationwide improve operations and improve cash flow management in challenging economic environments. Contact the Water Utility Consultants and Wastewater Consulting Experts at StepWise today! Click here to get your own unique version of this article with free reprint rights.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • TwitThis
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • Pownce
  • MySpace

Making A Claim For Mesothelioma Compensation. Exactly what A Person Needs To Know

March 11th, 2010

Any individual that is diagnosed as having mesothelioma and has previously worked someplace where they’ve been subject to asbestos exposure should consider obtaining legal advice to see if they can bring a civil law personal injury claim for mesothelioma compensation from their employer.

As mesothelioma claims undoubtedly are a very specialised area, when calling compensation lawyers or a mesothelioma law firm it is always important to ask:

When making a mesothelioma claim does the attorney specialise in asbestos cases and asbestos claims. Are they fully conversant with asbestos law and specifically mesothelioma law and mesothelioma litigation?

How many mesothelioma compensation cases has the attorney dealt with?

How many of these mesothelioma claims have in fact come to court? (Often cases are settled out of court which may be preferable to you)

How many asbestos claims has the attorney successfully dealt with in the last three years?

Would you be expected to pay the mesothelioma lawyers ? Or will they work on a no-win/no-fee basis? This tends to be the norm and it is highly recommended that you get an attorney that will work on this basis. Find out how they get paid for acting for you.

In the case of the mesothelioma compensation are there any more expenses you could be expected to pay, such as court costs and court fees?

Precisely how will you be kept informed on what is happening with your claim for mesothelioma compensation ?

Just how long will the mesothelioma claims process take?

How soon does the attorney expect to start a court action?

For the mesothelioma compensation claim to be successful you will have to show that:

It is likely that your mesothelioma compensation claim is a result of exposure to asbestos during the course of your work. This will be hard to prove, so the legal phrase is that ‘on the balance of probabilities’ the asbestos exposure caused the condition. Which means although it cannot be certain that the mesothelioma was brought on by one or more jobs, it is in all likelihood that it was.

And

Your employer at that time was careless (negligent) in not keeping up the standards required by common law.

It may be possible to sue your employer for specific offences against health and safety regulations.

If a previous employer has gone out of business it may be possible to make a mesothelioma compensation claim against the firm’s insurers.

As you can see there is quite a lot to consider when making a claim for mesothelioma compensation BUT if you ask the right questions you should have no problems.

If you are interested in reading more about mesothelioma compensation then visit this helpful site http://mesotheliomaarticle.net/mesothelioma-compensation

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • TwitThis
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • Pownce
  • MySpace

Benefits Of A Car Insurance Quote For New Driver In Canada

March 11th, 2010

When it comes to driving on the roads of Canada everyone needs to hold a certain amount of car insurance. It is vital to receive a car insurance quote for new driver in Canada for a number of reasons. Check out these top advantages of insurance quotes and car insurance coverage that anyone can receive!

If you do not want to get into any trouble with the law then you will need to carry around car insurance. Canada government has set up a number of requirements that are required for all new drivers. Make sure that you know which requirements that you need to meet so that you can start driving on the roads immediately.

In order to save as much money as possible and get the right coverage for our car and budget, you will need to start the quote process. Take the time to get online and find out who your major competitors are. From there you can apply with each of them to start the comparison price and have all of your initial questions asked.

Getting a car insurance quote for new driver in Canada will also plug you into cheap premiums. Every company that you talk to will give you a 6 month premium that is comes with a couple different payment options. You can pay the premium up front and have coverage for a solid 6 months, or you can pay on a monthly basis. Make sure to go with what you can afford at one time.

Those drivers with bad credit need to use quotes in order to save money on their overall down payment. Look for a company that does not ask for a lot of money and still gives you a good amount of insurance. If you have a pristine driving record, you should be able to save a lot of money despite what your credit report says.

Look into other features that you can receive with your coverage policy. When you look over a car insurance quote for new driver in Canada find out about rental car coverage and even medical expenses. In the event of an accident you will still be able to get around town and get all of your work done while your damaged car is being fixed up.

All features and coverage options are designed to keep you safe at all times. When driving, you will need to carry around the insurance cards with you so that you are safe in the event of an accident or traffic stop. Passengers that drive along with you will also be safe, given that you have the right amount of coverage.

Now is the best time to get a car insurance quote for new driver in Canada. If you want to enjoy your new car and save tons of money you need to start the insurance quote process right now. Within an hour you could have what you need to drive your brand new car! the sooner you get started online, the sooner you can start enjoying the open road!

This reliable car insurance dealership offers competitive rates along with exceptional customer service, thus providing the best valued car insurance in Ontario. You are guaranteed a safe driving experience by entrusting us with your auto insurance needs.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • TwitThis
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • Pownce
  • MySpace

Massachusetts Strengthens Rules For Small Claims Collection Lawsuits

March 11th, 2010

The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court revealed last week that it has amended some of the rules governing the use of small claims courts. The Court said that the changes were formed specifically to address the amount of debt collection cases that are filed in small claims courts.

The rule changes come on the recommendation of the Small Claims Working Group, a panel of legal experts that was created in 2006 to examine and improve current small claims practices. In a press release revealing the changes, the Supreme Judicial Court noted that While the rules apply to all small claims matters, there will be a major impact on debt collection cases. The changes address many of the problems recognized by the Working Group in collection cases, and four in particular: increased validness of service, inadequately detailed claims, increased close examination of default judgments, and notice to the court when a judgment is paid.

Adam Olshan, an attorney with Law Offices, Howard Lee Schiff, P.C. in Worcester, Mass., concurs that some collection law firms will be affected. This will effect the high-volume collection law firms.

But Olshan, who was on the Working Group representing credit card issuers, noted that most collection law firms ” including his own ” do not make use of small claims courts. If the plaintiff fails to confirm the address, the court may not enter a default judgment if the defendant later fails to appear for trial.

The changes also add elevated scrutiny to default judgments that are entered. New small claims laws require plaintiffs to inform the court in writing when a small claims judgment has been paid in full, or be responsible for any reasonable costs incurred by the defendant in later establishing that it was satisfied.

Another requirement is that the magistrate or judge is to analyze the terms of any agreement for judgment with the parties if they are present in court. This makes certain that the court does not order or otherwise endorse any private payment agreement that relies on exempt sources of income. This avoids any arbitrary surprise to the defendant by delaying any levy on the judgment until the defendant has had an opportunity to pay as ordered or to attend a payment hearing.

Mallory McGuinness works for a collections agency that works with a debt collection lawyer. Also, she does articles on business and finance, consumer spending and collections agencies.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • TwitThis
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • Pownce
  • MySpace

What Is The FDCPA?

March 11th, 2010

In order to skirmish the topics associated with harassing debt collectors and debt collection companies, the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (also known as the FDCPA) was constructed. The laws and regulations determined by the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act not only guard consumers, but they also assist debt collection agencies as well by encouraging them to act in a serious and professional manner when engaging in dialog with supposed debtors.

In most standings lenders are within their rights to go after payment. This includes situations where the borrower is neglectful in their responsibilities and then afterwords default on their financial obligations, and or if the borrower simply needs some more time due to acrid financial circumstances and strain. These above situations represent instances in which the lender is not getting his due payments from the borrower when they began with a reasonable expectation of being paid back in an adequate time frame. No matter the reason in these cases, the lender in question is legally within their rights to seek payment that they are due.

In these situations, a lot of times lenders have no other option but to become involved with a collection agency. The goal of collection agencies is to recover and collect all of the monies that are overdue to their clients (the lenders). Due to the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, collection companies can not act neglectfully and with inadvertence for the consequences of their actions when trying to recover monies for their clients.There are several conditions that come along with the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act as enacted in 1978. These conditions both protect debtors and enable collection companies to strongly pursue valid debts.

Even if a debtor instructs a collections representative to conclude all further contact with him there are other means by which a debt collection representative may strive for the valid debt. For example, under the FDCPA, while the collection rep must accept the debtors request to cease any further contact with them, they are also perfectly within their rights to make the debtor aware that they intend to pursue the debt via legal channels through an attorney.

If the collection agency accountable for recovering the delinquent account cannot communicate with or cannot reach the debtor, then they are legally allowed to contact third parties related to the debtor. However, under the FDCPA there are some boundaries to contacting third parties. First and foremost, the collection rep cannot harass the third party or be non-courteous. Also importantly, the collection rep cannot violate the right of privacy of the debtor by disclosing the nature of the call to this third party.

Among protocols for collection agencies to abide by, the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act also has a penalization system in place for those collection companies that do not abide by the aforementioned stipulations. These penalties against collection agencies found to be in violation of the FDCPA include: fines; license revocation; and even legal actions.

At first glance it appears as though the guidelines of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act are strongly skewed toward the debtor. However, these rules also protect the debt collection agency by helping them steer to wards fair practices and policies in a courteous and professional manner. Without the FDCPA, the unprofessional behaviors of some select few collection agencies would go unchecked and thus would undermine the entire reputation of the business of debt collection.

Mallory McGuinness works for a collections agency that works with a debt collection lawyer. Also, she does pieces on business, finance, the credit industry and collections agencies.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • TwitThis
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • Pownce
  • MySpace